Why Reggie Jackson and Cal Ripken Rookie Cards are Better than Mike Trout Rookies

To some who would hear that one thinks Cal Ripken or Reggie Jackson rookie cards are a better investment than rookie cards of Mike Trout, some might say no way.

Let me explain this logic.  For one, Mike Trout is a mega superstar these days and his Topps Update rookie card is worth about $200.  However, he is still playing in the Major Leagues and the future value of his rookie card is tied to how well he performs.  With a $200 card, there is a lot of speculation built in.  Just look at what happened to rookie cards of Barry Bonds and Alex Rodriguez as they fell in value later in the players' careers.  I am not saying that will happen with Mike Trout, but risk is there.

For rookie cards of Cal Ripken, a nice near mint one from say 1982 Donruss can be found for under $20.  You could buy ten of those compared to one Mike Trout Topps Update rookie card.  I would say the Ripken rookies would be a much safer investment, and that $200 spent there could turn into $300 or more in 10 years.

A Reggie Jackson near mint rookie is about $100.  He is an example of an established hall of famer that, in my opinion will always be in demand for the years to come. 

I view the Jackson and Ripken rookies as better investments.  Do you agree?  Please post in the comments.